Personal Vision of Ministry

Individual Vision of Ministry Statement â€Å"Creative, loving, and inspired ministry that loosens the weights of religion, andâ leadsâ people to aâ lifetime,â obedient relationship with our Lord Jesus Christ. † Each word in thatâ visionâ statement is noteworthy to me and portrays my profound being to this point. Creativityâ is essential to me, not on the grounds that promoting or me being somewhat innovative, but since from the earliest starting point, our God was an imaginative God; I don’t accept there is any roomâ forâ becoming stale in Christianity.Love is the focal topic of the Bible, and it is the most significant of the Great Commandment’s. It is just through day by day accommodation thatâ inspirationâ will come, and it is just through motivation and declaration that I discover the solidarity to do God’s work. There areâ two â€Å"R† wordsâ that are particular when sharing ministry: Religion and Relationshi p. They are not the equivalent. Religion: being the confidence in and love of an individual God or Gods Details of conviction as instructed or discussed.Relationship: the manner by which at least two ideas, articles, or individuals are associated, or the condition associated. Model being Jesus Christ associated as our own Lord and Savior. So this would be my own service of how I am to share Christ Jesus Love. To have the option to instruct, and lead others to Christ through sacred text. As a congregation youth serve, I ought to be one that is associated with today’s youth. An adolescent clergyman should lead kids, in their profound development as well as their self-improvement as well.A youth serve needs to have incredible initiative characteristics and have a lot of understanding and declaration so as to impart to the youngsters. I should have the option to prepare and empower others inside the congregation. I will be discipline, self-propelled, sorted out, and profoundly de velop. This is the reason I trust AME will assist me with promoting Gods service, and addition more information on what god's identity is. Sacred writing says Lots regarding information all through the book of scriptures. One of my preferred refrains clarifying Gods sovereign information is in Proverbs.Proverbs 3:1-35: My child, remember my educating, yet let your heart keep my instructions, for length of days and long stretches of life and harmony they will add to you. Allow not ardent to love and steadfastness for purpose you; tie them around your neck; keep in touch with them on the tablet of your heart. So you will discover favor and great achievement in seeing God and man. Trust in the Lordâ with everything that is in you, and don't incline toward your own comprehension. | May God use me to achieve His motivations.

The Shifts in Power Within Brian Friels Translations

The Shifts in Power Within Brian Friels Translations Question: Discuss the different movements of intensity inside Friel's Translations and assess their significance.Enjoy :)The movements in power and the contention which this causes are essential parts of Brian Friel's Translations, and this contention can be seen, and is brought about by, the social, semantic and ideological contrasts between characters, specific the English and Irish. Most likely the essential explanation behind this contention is the proceeded with debilitation of the Irish, which develops increasingly obvious as the play advances, and can be connected to the straightforward demonstration of mapping the Irish open country, which not just goes about as a methods for estimating Ireland, yet in addition changing the way of life of its occupants. I accept that Friel purposely utilized this gadget in Translations to upgrade the dramatization, and significance, of his work, and this has been successfully done in Translations.The history of the Irish individuals, similar to that of numerous around the globe, is an account of consistent victory and debilitation by outside forces.English: Various Irish whiskies. Picture by Cafeir...From the Romans intrusions to that of the English, this dominion has affected on the way of life and life of the Irish, yet none has had the option to completely absorb their lifestyle. Indeed, even the colonization of the English, which has been set up for more than 400 years, has not had the option to completely accomplish authority over the Irish culture, because of the wild obstruction of the vanquished individuals. This social contrast between the English and the Irish is the essential wellspring of contention in Brian Friel's Translations, and this can be seen from multiple points of view. Right off the bat, we consider the To be as the previous; a stale, fossilized society who are reluctant to change to the new ways, while the English are the future, in that they are seen as new and continually developing. A striking model which maintains...

buy custom Delta Air Lines essay

purchase custom Delta Air Lines paper Streak Streak is a cross-stage medium and is good and all around upheld by around 95-98% of internet browsers in the marketso if Delta fuses Flash on its site, it will be guaranteed the substance will be seen effectively by a client whose program has the Flash module, yet free on working framework and program. This captivating mechanical medium will add intuitiveness and gaudy illustrations to Deltas site. For example, Delta can utilize it to make captivating 2D movements, which are additionally simple to see. Delta can utilize Flash to introduce data in a manner plain composed words alone can't do, remembering that video functions admirably in Flash applications on the program in any case the OS programming, for example, Media Player. Streak interface has supplanted the customary non-static components on website page with ones that enthusiastic cooperate with clients. Streak on Delta Air Lines can make the interface additionally retaining and indulgingwhen utilized in making booking struct ures and cost adding machines, which is consistently a decent advertising apparatus that is probably going to upgrade deals. Sound With the assistance of rapid web, sound has turned a geat advertising apparatus that inevitably expands deals. With sound on Delta site, guests will the experience of a mix of visual and intuitiveness, (for example, the one offered by Flash), consequently making a noteworthy site. The vast majority can play gushing sound, which means sound on sites is definitely not a confused medium. Guests will think that its an animating change to tune in to a voice of all the content they read. By fusing sound, Delta will make its site remarkable and critical, henceforth alluring and with odds of expanding deals. Individuals are bound to review what they tune in to than what they read. Late inquires about built up that only 20% of people review what they read analyzed 70% recollect what they hear. By consolidating sound Delta will permit itself threefold all the more a stick factor to its site guests. Fortunately, with sound, there are no restrictions to what Delta can let its site guests tune in to. For example, Delta could feature its clients rousing input and tributes, a training that has a ton of potential in expanding deals. Video Delta can likewise consider utilizing Videovideos are probably the best technique for passing aalong messages to crowds. Truth be told, it is a lot simpler to take in visual pictures than read writings. In a large portion of the occasions, the visual effect produced by recordings can be utilized in an inventive way to loosen up and beguile the psychological symbolism of a various crowd. Video is the best decision for straightforward and persuading interchanges. Individuals get a passionate association all the more excitedly with sound and moving pictures in recordings than other media. To be sure, the crowd can feel nearer to reality through video. Attributable to its inclination, video medium can be exceptionally flexible in style and tone used to communicate different messages. A specific video in itself can be incredible, with notorious designs slice to captivating music to establish the pace of an item. Delta can likewise utilize video embed contemporary narratives on its site to grandstand its training or activity. A decent video must be went with the correct help material, which will make it among the best methods for connecting with a worldwide crowd over the clock. Be that as it may, any related mix-up can make a decent video a bungle, for example, a poor video player or poor goals. In any case, recordings can possibly build deals for Delta dependent on all the examined highlights. Purchase custom Delta Air Lines article

Evolutionary Psychology Short

Transformative Psychology Short Buss thought of a hypothesis that planned for settling a relevant transformative issue, which is identified with mating methodologies among people. The investigation built up that the two people have advanced some mental frameworks that portray both short and long haul methodologies. His investigation uncovered that people will in general determination transient mating issues instead of long-term.Advertising We will compose a custom basic composing test on Evolutionary Psychology: Short-term Mating in Men explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More various researcher contrast on the job of methodology in mating, with some proposing that it underpins it is typically objective arranged while others accepting that it is comprised of a power past an individual’s control. For certain researchers, for example, Freud and Jung, their view was that people look for in their mates includes that take after the attributes of their other gender guardians. For certain researchers, for example, Winch, an individual searches for a band together with a trademark that oneself doesn't have. At the end of the day, the individual is keen on integrally whereby the characteristics of the accomplice would reinforce their character. In light of this, the facts confirm that mating in people is constantly vital, which is impacted by an individual’s decision and inclination. Studies show that men have constantly sought after transient mating, especially when the advantages of propagation exceed the expenses of keeping up such a relationship. Due to certain contrasts among people, men would will in general go for momentary mating instead of ladies. Some social, social, and innovative improvements in the western world have formed the mating framework among men. Social issues, for example, conceptive chances, have affected the advancement of momentary mating among men in the western social orders. Ladies need to explain issues identified with adjustment before takin g part in momentary mating while men have the capacity of adjusting quicker, allowing them a chance to adapt better. This is a social issue since the general public places ladies in a second rate position and they need to comprehend the conduct of any man before participating in a genuine relationship, in any case alluded to as long haul mating. With some social turns of events, the issue of accomplice number has been of incredible worry to men in the western social orders, which influences transient mating. Having such a large number of ladies is blurring ceaselessly, with social turns of events. In the conventional society, a man would draw in a few ladies in a relationship, however the present western culture doesn't open minded polygamy. The issue of availability to sex is another innovative advancement that impacts momentary mating among men. As a man relates with a lady, he investigates the most ideal routes through which sex could be gotten to (Buss, 2012).Advertising Looking for basic composition on brain research? How about we check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Based on the overall conditions, transient mating is increasingly versatile for men undoubtedly. Thusly, propagation isn't the manner in which it used to be on the grounds that numerous components are considered before investing in a relationship. Men attempt however much as could be expected to limit expenses and dangers as they endeavor to decrease duty. Men are not, at this point keen on genuine duties that would devour their time. Momentary mating offers an option in contrast to men who are keen on riches gathering through business. On their side, ladies are keen on framing connections that would assist them with separating assets, the issue of quality, and development of long haul connections. These are a portion of the things that transient mating in men attempts to determine, as it spares men from superfluous use. Reference Buss, D. (2012). Dev elopmental Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. New York: Pearson.

The Management Theory of Max Weber

The Management Theory of Max Weber Bur??u?r??? i? a way ?f administratively ?rg?nizing l?rg? numb?r? ?f ????l? wh? n??d to w?rk t?g?th?r.Organizations in th? ?ubli? ?nd ?riv?t? ???t?r, in?luding universities ?nd g?v?rnm?nt?, r?l? ?n bureaucracies t? function.The term bureaucracy lit?r?ll? m??n? “rul? by d??k? or offices,” a definition that highlights th? ?ft?n impersonal ?h?r??t?r ?f bur??u?r??i??.Ev?n though bur??u?r??i?? sometimes ???m in?ffi?i?nt or w??t?ful, ??tting up a bureaucracy h?l?? ensure th?t thousands ?f ????l? w?rk together in compatible ways by d?fining ?v?r??n?’? r?l?? within a hierarchy.WHAT BUREAUCRATS DOG?v?rnm?nt bur??u?r?t? perform a wid? variety ?f tasks.We often think ?f bur??u?r?t? as ????r-?u?hing d??k ?l?rk?, but bureaucrats fight fires, t???h, ?nd monitor how f?d?r?l candidates r?i?? money, ?m?ng ?th?r ??tiviti??.The j?b of a bureaucrat i? t? implement g?v?rnm?nt ??li??, t? t?k? th? l?w? ?nd d??i?i?n? m?d? by ?l??t?d ?ffi?i?l? ?nd put th?m int? practice.S?m? bureaucrats im?l?m?nt ??li? ? by writing rules and r?gul?ti?n?, wh?r??? ?th?r? ?dmini?t?r ??li?i?? directly t? ????l? (?u?h ?? di?tributing ?m?ll bu?in??? l??n? ?r tr??ting patients at a veterans’ h???it?l).Th? t??k ?f running the government, and ?r?viding ??rvi??? thr?ugh ??li?? im?l?m?nt?ti?n, i? ??ll?d ?ubli? ?dmini?tr?ti?n.BUREAUCRATIC FUNCTIONS Th? t?rm bur??u?r??? is ?ft?n u??d in a negative ??n?? (?.g. r?d t???, ?ffi?i?ld?m).H?w?v?r, it r?f?r? t? a specific f?rm ?f ?rg?niz?ti?n with certain ?h?r??t?ri?ti??.The concept ?f bur??u?r??? and bureaucratic organization w?? first put f?rw?rd ???t?m?ti??ll? b? th? G?rm?n ???d?mi? and ???i?li?t, M?x W?b?r (1864-1920).He ?r???und?d th? bur??u?r?ti? theory ?f ?rg?niz?ti?n as th? m??t d?min?nt ?nd a univ?r??l model of organization th?t exists t? a greater ?xt?nt in b?th ?riv?t? ?nd ?ubli? sectors even t?d??.W?b?r w?? born in G?rm?n? in 1864 ?nd gr?w u? during th? tim? when indu?tri?liz?ti?n w?? tr?n?f?rming g?v?rnm?nt, business, ?nd ???i?t?.Weber w?? int?r??t?d in indu?tri?l???it?li?m, ?n economic ???t?m wh?r? indu?tr? i? ?riv?t?l? controlled ?nd ???r?t?d f?r ?r?fit. W?b?r w?nt?d to kn?w wh? indu?tri?l capitalism w?? ?u?????ful in some ??untri?? ?nd n?t in ?th?r?.H? b?li?v?d that large-scale ?rg?niz?ti?n? ?u?h ?? f??t?ri?? ?nd government d???rtm?nt? w?r? a ?h?r??t?ri?ti? of ???it?li?t ???n?mi??.W?b?r vi?it?d th? Unit?d States in 1904 t? study th? U.S. ???n?m?.It was h?r? th?t h? ?b??rv?d the spirit ?f capitalism.H? n?t?d that ???it?li?m in th? United St?t?? ?n??ur?g?d ??m??titi?n ?nd inn?v?ti?n.H? also realized th?t bu?in????? w?r? run b? ?r?f???i?n?l managers ?nd th?t th?? were link?d thr?ugh ???n?mi? r?l?ti?n?hi??.H? ??ntr??t?d thi? with ???it?li?ti? ?r??ti??? in G?rm?n? wh?r? a small group ?f powerful ????l? ??ntr?ll?d the ???n?m?.In Germany, tr?diti?n di?t?t?d b?h?vi?ur?. P???l? were given positions of authority based ?n their ???i?l standing ?nd ??nn??ti?n?, ?nd bu?in????? w?r? link?d by f?mil? ?nd social r?l?ti?n?hi??.W?b?r w?? ??n??rn ?d th?t ?uth?rit? w?? n?t a fun?ti?n ?f ?x??ri?n?? ?nd ability, but w?n b? ???i?l ?t?tu?.B???u?? ?f thi?, m?n?g?r? w?r? n?t l???l t? the ?rg?niz?ti?n.Org?niz?ti?n?l resources w?r? u??d f?r the benefit ?f owners and m?n?g?r? r?th?r th?n to m??t ?rg?niz?ti?n?l g??l?.W?b?r w?? ??nvin??d that organizations based ?n r?ti?n?l ?uth?rit?, wh?r? authority w?? giv?n t? the most ??m??t?nt and qu?lifi?d ????l?, w?uld be m?r? efficient th?n th??? based ?n wh? you knew.W?b?r called this t??? ?f r?ti?n?l ?rg?niz?ti?n a bur??u?r???.In his ?n?l??i? ?f ???i?l ???t?m?, h? identified that ???h social ???t?m was m?int?in?d b? th? interaction ?f thr?? r?l?t?d concepts: ??w?r, authority and l?gitim???.P?W?R: It i? exercised by ???r?i?n. P?w?r ?n?bl?? one person or a ruler t? u?? f?r?? ?v?r ?n?th?r.AUTH?RIT?: it has a ???t?m of b?li?f? that gives th? rul?r ?r a person th? right t? i??u? th? ?rd?r and gives th? f?ll?w?r? the duty t? ?b?? it with?ut questioning. Auth?rit? implies acceptance ?f rul? b? those ?v?r wh?m it i? t? b? ?x?r?i??d.LEGITIMACY: If individuals in a ???i?t? or in an ?rg?niz?ti?n m?m?riz? th?t th? ??w?r held b? th? rul?r i? right ?nd acceptable, it legitimizes th? exercise ?f ?uth?rit?.W?b?r ??ught t? id?ntif? th? r????n? wh? individu?l? act in ??rt?in ways in an organization ?nd wh? they ?b?? th??? in ?uth?rit? ?v?r th?m.H? f?und th?t ????l? obey th??? in authority b???u?? ?f the influ?n?? ?f thr?? t???? of l?gitim?t? ?uth?rit?.In ?th?r w?rd?, W?b?r id?ntifi?d ?nd described thr?? t???? of ?uth?rit? structures ?nd th? ???t?m of b?li?f b? which ?n? ?uth?rit? is l?gitim?t?d.TR?DITI?N?L ?UTH?RIT?: tr?diti?n?l ?uth?rit? r??t? ?n th? beliefs, traditions ?nd ?u?t?m?. Individu?l? ?b?? th? ?uth?rit? because ?f th?ir tr?diti?n? ?r ?u?t?m?. A ??r??n ?nj??? personal authority b? virtu? ?f their inh?rit?d / inborn ?t?tu?. Simil?rl?, individuals ?b?? th? ?uth?rit? b???u?? of th?ir f?ith, tr?diti?n ?nd ?u?t?m related to th? ??r??n. Admini?tr?tiv? ????r?tu? in thi? kind of ?uth?ri t? consists ?f th? ??r??n?l relatives, favourites, ?nd servants.CHARISMATIC AUTHORITY: Thi? t??? ?f ?uth?rit? i? l?gitim?t?d ?n th? b?li?f th?t authority h?? ??m? kind ?f magical or gift?d ??w?r. L?gitim??? in authority arises from l???lt? t?, ??nfid?n?? in ?nd ??r??n?l ?u?liti?? of th? ??r??n/rul?r. Admini?tr?tiv? ????r?tu? ?r ?uth?rit? ?tru?tur? in thi? type ?f ?uth?rit? is v?r? loose ?nd unstable ?nd consists ?f faithful f?ll?w?r?.RATIONAL-LEGAL ?UTH?RIT?: Rational l?g?l ?uth?rit? i? n?t owed t? anyone personally rather r??t? ?n th? r?ti?n?ll? enacted l?w?, rul?? ?nd r?gul?ti?n? that specify the rul?? th?t individuals ?h?uld ?b??. Th? authority arises because ?f th? ?ffi?? or position ?f the ??r??n in authority. Th? person in ?uth?rit? i? b?und?d/ r??tri?t?d b? th? rul??, regulations ?nd procedures ?f th? organization. Sub?rdin?t?? ?b?? th? ?uth?rit? ?f ?u??ri?r b???u?? the ?u??ri?r h?? l?g?l ?uth?rit?.F??TUR?? ?F W?B?R’? BUREAUCRACY W?b?r has giv?n a number of f??tur?? ?f bure aucracy.The f?ll?wing f??tur?? ?ugg??t th? characteristics ?f bur??u?r?ti? ?rg?ni??ti?n? ?? d?fin?d b? W?b?r.Selection Based on QualificationsOffi?i?l? ?r? recruited based ?n qu?lifi??ti?n?, and are appointed, n?t elected, t? th? office. People ?r? compensated with a ??l?r?, and ?r? n?t ??m??n??t?d with b?n?fit? such as rights to l?nd, power ?t?.A bureaucracy i? founded ?n rational-legal authority.This t??? ?f authority rests on the b?li?f in th? l?g?lit? of f?rm?l rul?? ?nd hi?r?r?hi??, ?nd in th? right ?f those ?l?v?t?d in th? hi?r?r?h? t? ??????? ?uth?rit? and issue commands.Auth?rit? i? giv?n to officials b???d on their skills, position and authority placed f?rm?ll? in each position.Thi? ?h?uld di??l??? ??rli?r t???? administrative ???t?m?, where ?uth?rit? w?? l?gitimiz?d b???d ?n ?th?r, ?nd m?r? individu?l, ?????t? ?f ?uth?rit? like wealth, ???iti?n, ownership, h?rit?g? etc.HierarchyA hi?r?r?h? with assignments fl?wing downward ?nd accountability fl?wing u?w?rd.Th? ?rg?niz?ti?n is divid?d int? ?l??r-?ut l?v?l?.E??h level ???ign? r????n?ibiliti?? t? th? l?v?l b?n??th it, whil? each lower level is accountable to th? l?v?l ?b?v? f?r fulfilling those ???ignm?nt?.Hierarchy i? a system ?f r?nking v?ri?u? ???iti?n? in d????nding scale from t?? t? bottom ?f the ?rg?ni??ti?n. In bur??u?r?ti? organization, ?ffi??? also f?ll?w th? ?rin?i?l? of hierarchy i.e., each l?w?r ?ffi?? is subject t? ??ntr?l ?nd ?u??rvi?i?n b? high?r ?ffi??.Thu?, n? ?ffi?? is l?ft un??ntr?ll?d in th? organization.This i? the fund?m?nt?l ??n???t of hi?r?r?h? in bur??u?r?ti? ?rg?ni??ti?n. Thi? hi?r?r?h? serves ?? lin?? ?f ??mmuni??ti?n ?nd d?l?g?ti?n ?f ?uth?rit?. It im?li?? that ??mmuni??ti?n ??ming d?wn ?r g?ing u? mu?t pass thr?ugh each ???iti?n.Simil?rl?, a subordinate will get ?uth?rit? from his imm?di?t? ?u??ri?r. H?w?v?r, thi? hi?r?r?h? i? n?t unit?r? but sub-pyramids of ?ffi?i?l? within th? l?rg? organization ??rr????nding ?t?. functional divisions exist.Thu?, th?r? ?r? offices with th? same amount ?f ?uth?rit? but with diff?r?nt kind? of functions ???r?ting in diff?r?nt ?r??? ?f ??m??t?n??.For ?x?m?l?, the G?v?rnm?nt organizations, w? ??n ?b??rv? separate offices l??king ?ft?r particular functions. Thi? h????n? in business organizations too.Division of WorkE??h member ?f a bureaucracy has a ????ifi? t??k t? fulfil, ?nd all ?f th? t??k? ?r? th?n ???rdin?t?d t? ????m?li?h th? purpose ?f the ?rg?niz?ti?n.In a ??ll?g?, f?r ?x?m?l?, a t???h?r does n?t run th? h??ting ???t?m, th? ?r??id?nt does n?t teach, ?nd a ???r?t?r? d??? not ?v?lu?t? t?xtb??k?.Th??? t??k? ?r? di?tribut?d ?m?ng ????l? wh? have been trained to d? th?m.W?rk of th? ?rg?ni??ti?n is divid?d on the b??i? ?f ????i?li??ti?n t? take th? ?dv?nt?g?? of division of labour. E??h ?ffi?? in th? bureaucratic ?rg?ni??ti?n has ????ifi? ??h?r? of ??m??t?n??.Thi? inv?lv??:A sphere ?f ?blig?ti?n? t? ??rf?rm fun?ti?n? which has b??n marked ?ff as part ?f a ???t?m?ti? divi?i?n of labour;Th? ?r?vi?i?n ?f the incumbent wit h n??????r? ?uth?rit? t? ??rr? out th??? functions; ?ndTh? n??????r? m??n? ?f ??m?ul?i?n ?r? clearly defined and th?ir u?? is ?ubj??t t? d?finit? ??nditi?n?.Thu?, divi?i?n ?f l?b?ur try t? ?n?ur? th?t ???h ?ffi?? h?? a ?l??rl?-d?fin?d ?r?? ?f ??m??t?n?? within th? organization and ???h ?ffi?i?l kn?w? th? ?r??? in which h? ???r?t?? ?nd th? areas in which h? mu?t ?b?t?in fr?m action ?? that he does not overstep th? boundary b?tw??n his role ?nd th??? of ?th?r?.Further, divi?i?n ?f l?b?ur also tri?? to ?n?ur? th?t no work i? l?ft un??v?r?d.Official RulesA b??i? ?nd most ?m?h??i??d f??tur? ?f bur??u?r?ti? organization i? th?t ?dmini?tr?tiv? ?r????? is ??ntinu?u? ?nd g?v?rn?d b? ?ffi?i?l rules.In th?ir attempt t? b???m? ?ffi?i?nt, bureaucracies stress writt?n ?r???dur??.In general, the l?ng?r a bureaucracy ?xi?t? ?nd th? l?rg?r it gr?w?, the more writt?n rules it h??.The rul?? of ??m? bur??u?r??i?? ??v?r just ?b?ut every im?gin?bl? situationa r?ti?n?l ???r???h to organization calls for a ???t?m ?f m?int?ining rules t? ?n?ur? twin r?quir?m?nt? ?f unif?rmit? ?nd ???rdin?ti?n ?f ?ff?rt? by individu?l members in the ?rg?ni??ti?n.Th??? rul?? are m?r? ?r less stable and more ?r l??? ?xh?u?tiv?. Wh?n there i? n? rule ?n ?n? ?????t ?f ?rg?ni??ti?n?l ???r?ti?n, the m?tt?r i? r?f?rr?d u?w?rd f?r d??i?i?n which ?ub???u?ntl? becomes precedent f?r futur? decision ?n th? ?imil?r m?tt?r.Rul?? provide th? b?n?fit? of stability, ??ntinuit?, and ?r?di?t?bilit? and ???h ?ffi?i?l knows ?r??i??l? the ?ut??m? of hi? behaviour in a ??rti?ul?r m?tt?r.Standard ???r?ting procedure, ?l?? ??ll?d formalized rul??, SOP informs w?rk?r? about how t? h?ndl? t??k? ?nd ?itu?ti?n?.Everybody ?lw??? follows the ??m? procedures t? increase efficiency and ?r?di?t?bilit? ?? that the ?rg?niz?ti?n will ?r?du?? ?imil?r results in ?imil?r circumstances.Standard operating ?r???dur? ??n ??m?tim?? make bur??u?r??? m?v? ?l?wl? because n?w procedures mu?t b? developed as ?ir?um?t?n??? ?h?ng?Impersonal Relationship sA n?t?bl? feature ?f bureaucracy is th?t relationships ?m?ng individu?l? ?r? g?v?rn?d through th? ???t?m ?f ?ffi?i?l ?uth?rit? ?nd rules.Offi?i?l positions ?r? free fr?m ??r??n?l involvement, emotions and ??ntim?nt?. Thus, d??i?i?n? ?r? g?v?rn?d by r?ti?n?l factors r?th?r th?n ??r??n?l factors.Thi? im??r??n?lit? ??n???t i? used in dealing with organizational r?l?ti?n? as w?ll as r?l?ti?n? b?tw??n the organization ?nd ?ut?id?r?.Official RecordBureaucratic ?rg?ni??ti?n i? characterised by m?int?n?n?? ?f ?r???r ?ffi?i?l r???rd?.The decisions ?nd ??tiviti?? of th? organization ?r? f?rm?ll? r???rd?d ?nd ?r???rv?d f?r futur? r?f?r?n??.Thi? is made ????ibl? b? ?xt?n?iv? u?? ?f filling system in th? ?rg?ni??ti?n.An official record i? almost regarded as ?n?n???l????di? ?f various ??tiviti?? ??rf?rm?d b? th? ????l? in th? organization.ADVANTAGES OF BUREAUCRACYW?b?r’? id??l bur??u?r??? h?? been designed to bring r?ti?n?lit? ?nd ?r?di?t?bilit? of b?h?vi?ur in ?rg?ni??ti?n? and b???u?? of it? ?h?r??t?ri?ti? features it ??ntribut?? t? the ?ffi?i?n?? in ???r?ti?n?.Weber treats bureaucracy ?? a ?u??ri?r f?rm ?f ?rg?ni??ti?n b???u?? it embodies th? v?lu?? ?f precision ?ffi?i?n??, ?bj??tivit?, unit?, discipline ?nd the like.Bur??u?r??? in Weber’s ??ini?n i? ?n administration d?vi?? that h?l?? in ??hi?ving th? following:SpecializationIt ?r?vid?? the ?dv?nt?g?? of specialization b???u?? every member i? assigned a specialized t??k t? perform. It l??d? t? ?ffi?i?n?? in th? ?rg?ni??ti?n.S???i?li??ti?n leads to ?im?lifi??ti?n and ?tr??mlining diff?r?nt t??k? in th? ?rg?ni??ti?n.B? ?n?uring that th? right m?n i? fitt?d t? th? right j?b, ????i?li??ti?n tends to ?r?m?t? efficiency ?nd discipline in j?b ??rf?rm?n??.Reduction in AmbiguityThe well-defined framework ?f rules and regulations r?du??? th? ?mbiguit? and ?nxi?t? ?m?ng ????l? ?? ?n? b?h?v?? in a required m?nn?r.Th? r???ti?n? under diff?r?nt situations ?r? w?ll known in ?dv?n?? ?? guid?lin?? ?xi?t in writing.Assurance of Impa rtialityC?nf?rmit? to rules ?nd regulations reduces th? n??d f?r di??r?ti?n t? th? minimum l?v?l and ?r?t??t? th? rights and r????n?ibiliti?? ?f employees fr?m b?ing tr??t?d ?rbitr?ril?.The ???t?m of im??r??n?l r?l?ti?n?hi?? in ?rg?ni??ti?n? i? to ?n?ur? impartial and ?bj??tiv? handling ?f ????l? ?nd ?v?nt?.SstructureA ?tru?tur? i? created f?r ??rf?rming th? duti?? ?nd r????n?ibilit?.It ??t? th? fr?m?w?rk f?r the functioning ?f the ?rg?niz?ti?n. People ?r? given t??k? ????rding to their ??m??t?n??.Th?r? i? a proper d?l?g?ti?n of ?uth?rit? in th? ?rg?ni??ti?n.Hierarchy Facilitates OrganizationHierarchy h?l?? in the ?ffi?i?nt ??rf?rm?n?? ?f ?rg?ni??ti?n?l fun?ti?n? b? f??ilit?ting ??mmuni??ti?n, control and ???rdin?ti?nRationality and ConsistencyA measure ?f objectivity is ?n?ur?d b? ?r???ribing in ?dv?n?? th? ?rit?ri? f?r decision m?king in routine ?itu?ti?n?.The d??i?i?n? are t?k?n as per th? l?w?, rules, ?nd r?gul?ti?n?.Th?? do n?t g? b? th?ir whim?, ?m?ti?n?, ?r ?r?judi???. Th? b? h?vi?ur ?f the ?m?l????? i? rational and predictable.B???u?? ?f the d?fin?d rules and r?gul?ti?n?, ?ll ??ti?n? ?r? t?k?n ??r?full?.Th?r? is ??n?i?t?n?? in actions. Th? j?b performance i? r?gul?t?d.ProfessionalizationThe qu?lifi??ti?n? and ??m??t?n?? ?f th? ??r??n? f?r ?m?l??m?nt in different jobs ?r?m?t? ?r?f???i?n?li?m.DemocracyEm?h??i? on qu?lifi??ti?n? ?nd t??hni??l ??m??t?n?? m?k? th? organization m?r? d?m??r?ti?.LIMITATIONS OF BUREAUCRACYThi? kind ?f id??l, im??r??n?l and ?bj??tiv? form ?f m?n?g?m?nt emerged in l?t? 1800s as a r??ult of M?x W?b?r’? disliking ?f m?n? Eur????n ?rg?niz?ti?n? whi?h were being organized and managed ?n a “??r??n?l” f?mil?-lik? b??i?.The ?m?l????? w?r? ??mmitt?d t? individu?l ?u??rvi??r? rather than the organization.He believed th?t it i? im??rt?nt that organizations are m?n?g?d im??r??n?ll? within a formal ?rg?niz?ti?n?l structure, wh?r? specific rules are f?ll?w?d.H? thought th?t ?uth?rit? is n?t based on a ??r??n? ??r??n?lit? but something th ?t i? ??rt ?f a ??r??n? j?b. It ?h?uld b? ?????d on fr?m individu?l to individual ?? ?n? ??r??n l??v?? ?nd ?n?th?r t?k?? ?v?r.But ?v?r a period ?f tim? the in??n?i?t?n?i?? developed in this kind ?f ?rg?ni??ti?n.Rigidity of RulesRul?? and r?gul?ti?n? in a bureaucracy ?r? ?ft?n rigid ?nd infl?xibl?.Rigid ?nd ?tri?t ??m?li?n?? ?f rul?? and regulations di???ur?g?? individu?l initi?tiv? ?nd ?r??tivit? ?nd hinders th? personality d?v?l??m?nt.Also m?tur? people h?v? th?ir ?wn g??l? and needs whi?h m?? go ?g?in?t th? ?rg?ni??ti?n?l g??l? and create ??nfli?t. The bureaucratic ?rg?ni??ti?n does n?t giv? any ??r ?r importance t? th? individu?l goals.Departmentalize or Empire BuildingBureaucracy ?n??ur?g?? th? ?vil w?rk ?f government int? a numb?r ?f isolated ?nd ??lf-d???nd?nt ???ti?n? ???h ?ur?uing it? ?wn needs without ?n? ?d?qu?t? ??rr?l?ti?n with th? r??t.Bureaucracy Loves Tradition and Stands for ConservatismD?v?l??? a negative ????h?l?g? that br??d? non-transparency ?nd stoppage to inf?r m?ti?n.Non Recognition of Informal GroupsThe bureaucratic ?rg?ni??ti?n r???gni??? ?nl? the f?rm?l authority and thus d??? n?t giv? ?n? importance t? the existence ?f interpersonal r?l?ti?n? ?nd informal ?rg?ni??ti?n within th? ?rg?ni??ti?n.ImpersonalityOrg?niz?ti?n?l rul?? ?nd regulations are given more ?ri?rit? ?v?r individual n??d? ?nd ?m?ti?n?. Th?r? i? a lack ?f personal touch.Non Innovative in NatureInn?v?ti?n? are di???ur?g?d in ?u?h organizations since ???h employee w?rk? in w?ll-d?fin?d ?r?di?t?bl? mannerPaper WorkIt inv?lv?? a l?t ?f ????r work ?? ?v?r? decision mu?t b? put in writing. It is very diffi?ult t? maintain ?ll ????r? safely. Thu?, th? v?r? foundation ?f ?u?h organization comes ?t ?t?k?.Unhealthy PracticesTh? rigid ?nd ?tr?ng ?dh?r?n?? ?f rul?? binds th? ????l? t? f?ll?w rul?? ?nd r?gul?ti?n?. The people start following th? ?rin?i?l? of “????l? f?r rul??” and n?t “rul?? f?r people”.People start f?ll?wing th? rul?? in l?tt?r and n?t in ??irit.Thu? in?t??d of ?r?viding guid?n??, rul?? b???m? th? source ?f in?ffi?i?n??. Th? rul?? ?r? misused ?nd misinterpreted b? th? ????l? wh? are concerned with im?l?m?nt?ti?n.Non EffectiveTh? bur??u?r?ti? ?rg?ni??ti?n i? not ?ff??tiv? in turbul?nt ?nvir?nm?nt?. It cannot und?rg? the change d?m?nd?d by the f??t changing ?nvir?nm?nt.Sin?? everything i? ?r?-d?fin?d and well d?fin?d. Th? turbul?nt environment ?f future could n?t h?v? b??n writt?n w?ll in ?dv?n??.Hampers CommunicationTh? bur??u?r?ti? organizations u?u?ll? have ??v?r?l l???r? of ?uth?rit?.These layers h?m??r ??mmuni??ti?n. It may t?k? l?ng tim? t? r???h fr?m top level to l?w??t level.And ??m?tim?? th? ??mmuni??ti?n m?? even l???? it? ??n?tit? b?f?r? it reaches ?t the l?w??t l?v?l.Red TapeBur??u?r?ti? ?r???dur?? involve unn??????r? delay whi?h l??d? to fru?tr?ti?n in the ??rf?rm?n?? of t??k.COMPATIBILITY OF WEBERS PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT IN TODAYS WORLDBur??u?r?ti? ?rg?niz?ti?n i? a v?r? rigid type of ?rg?niz?ti?n.Th?? ?r? b?und b? rigid c ontrols and ??nt find themselves adaptable to changing conditions in th? m?rk?t?l???, indu?tr? ?r l?g?l ?nvir?nm?nt.Vodafone UK’s Approach to Flexibility ProductivityL??king ?t th? bu?in??? wh?n I ?rriv?d, I realised th?t whil? Vodafone UK? ?r?du?t? ?nd ??rvi??? r?m?in?d inn?v?tiv? ?nd ??m??titiv?, its ??r??r?t? ?ultur? w?? t?? rigid f?r th? f??t-????d m?rk?t ?nd t?? ?ut??r?ti? t? ?ttr??t the best n?w t?l?nt. Gu? Laurence, CEO Vodafone UK.Vodafone UK idea w?? th?t if th? company ?x???t? it? customers t? bu? it? ?r?du?t?, it ?h?uld ?l?? be willing t? use th??? ?r?du?t?.V?d?f?n? UK r?f?rm?d their organization b? bringing a change in their workplace, ?nd ?h?ng? in th?ir w?rk ?nvir?nm?nt lik? no assigned ?ffi??? ?r d??k?, n? t?th?r?d ?h?n?? or computers, a v?ri?t? ?f purpose-built m??ting ??????, a t?ugh ?l??n desk and l?t? ?f ??ff??.Th? results w?r? imm?di?t? and int?n??: high r?v?nu? growth ?nd corporate ??luti?n?.The US Invasion on IraqWebers ?uth?rit? t???? help t? ?x?l?in th? US invading Ir?q in M?r?h 2003. It w?? th? charismatic ?uth?rit?, ??r??nifi?d b? US President G??rg? W. Bu?h whi?h l??d t? thi? invasion.H? w?? able t? influ?n?? th? American ???ul??? for the urg?n?? to ?tt??k Ir?q.It is ?l?? said th?t, a majority ?f Am?ri??n? w?r? ?ff??tiv?l? influenced by Bu?h in wh?t?v?r he did. Th?ugh there w?? a ??nfli?ti?n in l?g?l authority internationally, ?? Bush did n?t respect int?rn?ti?n?l l?w? ?nd th? UN b? ?u?h ?n illegal ??t.Ev?n though thi? inv??i?n w?? ill?g?l, th? int?rn?ti?n?l community ?nd legal ?uth?rit? ?f th? UN were not ?bl? to ?nf?r?? int?rn?ti?n?l l?w ?r to stop th? US invasion.R?ti?n?l L?g?l Auth?rit? Authority ?m??w?r?d b? l?g?l ?nd n?tur?l law. This ?uth?rit? h?? f?und strong r??t? in the m?d?rn state, ?it? g?v?rnm?nt?, ?riv?t? ?nd public ??r??r?ti?n?, and v?ri?u? voluntary associations.While W?b?r? th??r? ?ri?ritiz?? efficiency, it isnt n??????ril? th? best practice for l??d?r? to implement.  Max W?b?r w?? unlike most workplace l??d?r? today.Hi? theory ?f m?n?g?m?nt he ?tr????d ?tri?t rul?? ?nd a firm di?tributi?n of power. He wouldve ???ld?d todays m?n?g?r?(m??t ?f wh?m are ???n t? new id??? ?nd fl?xibl? w?rk arrangements) f?r th?ir l??d?r?hi? style.Pr??i?i?n, ????d, un?mbiguit?, knowledge ?f files, continuity, discretion, unit?, ?tri?t subordination, r?du?ti?n of friction ?nd ?f m?t?ri?l, ?nd personal costs â€" th??? ?r? r?i??d t? th? optimum ??int in th? ?tri?tl? bureaucratic administration ??id W?b?r.While hi? theory ?ri?ritiz?? ?ffi?i?n??, it i?nt necessarily th? b??t practice for l??d?r? to im?l?m?nt. Many ?f W?b?r? b?li?f? di???ur?g? ?r??tivit? and collaboration in th? w?rk?l???, and ?????? fl?xibilit? and risk. H?r? ?r? ??m? key ?l?m?nt? ?f th? M?x Weber management th??r? and h?w it ?ff??t? today’s w?rk ?l???.W?b?r b?li?v?d th?t r????n?ibiliti?? ?h?uld b? delegated b???d ?n ?kill ?nd ?bilit?.Th?r? ?h?uld b? no fl?xibl? roles. R?th?r, ?m?l????? ?h?uld b? ?w?r? ?f their ???iti?n? r????n?ibiliti?? and ?ti? k t? them. Str??ing ?ut?id? of th?ir designated r?l?? will disrupt th? hi?r?r?h? ?f ?uth?rit?.Therefore, collaboration, ?r??tiv? thinking ?nd idea ?it?hing ?r? ?l?? ?tr?ngl? di???ur?g?d.Hierarchy encourages the di?tributi?n ?f ??w?r among w?rk?r?. Em?l????? ranked high??t h?v? th? most ??w?r, while ?m?l????? r?nk?d l?w??t must report to th??? above th?m.W?rk?r? ?h?uld r?????t their ?u??rvi??r? ?nd b? ??rt?in n?t t? ?v?r?t?? any b?und?ri?? irrespective ?f wh?t qualification or kn?wl?dg? th?t th?? ???????.Weber called for ?nl? the m??t id??l candidates with th? ?x??t ?kill ??t r?quir?d f?r th? position t? ?n?ur? th? b??t results. Th?r? ?h?uld b? no nepotism or ?x???ti?n? t? th??? high ?t?nd?rd?. If a person is not ??rf??tl? qu?lifi?d, th?? ?r? n?t a fit.Just b???u?? a ??ndid?t? i? easy t? get ?l?ng with ?r w?rk? w?ll with others doesnt mean theyre right for th? job. Th? hiring d??i?i?n should b? b???d ??l?l? ?n their experience ?nd ?x??rti??.Weber did n?t condone ?n? type ?f personal relationship in th? workplace. H? supported th? n?ti?n th?t all w?rk r?l?ti?n?hi?? ?r? br?nd?d by rul?? and r?gul?ti?n?. There ?h?uld b? no ?m?ll t?lk, ??ll?b?r?ti?n ?r sharing of ideas. W?rk is w?rk â€" n?t a social ?uting.Some ?f these rules no longer w?rk f?r u? today. Th??? days, r????r?h h?? t?ld u? th?t m?tiv?t?d w?rk?r? ?r? m?r? efficient ?nd d?liv?r better r??ult? ?n th?ir work.A? a result, m?n?g?r? have to find creative w??? t? m?tiv?t? their workers.And th??? creative rul?? ?r? not really in ??nf?rmit? with Webers rules. T?k? f?r example, m?n?g?r? ?nd employees b?ing ?n first n?m? basis, ?r giving w?rk?r? flexibility.This t??? ?f ??tivit? i? ?tr?ngl? ??????d by W?b?r.CONCLUSIONReal life organizations wh?th?r ?ubli? ?nd private, d? ?xhibit v?r?ing d?gr??? ?f bureaucratization even today.H?w?v?r, it is more in g?v?rnm?nt?l and milit?r? ?rg?niz?ti?n? than in ?riv?t? bu?in??? and voluntary ?rg?ni??ti?n?. Yet it i? n?t f?ll?w?d by bu?in??? h?u??? in it? r??l ideal form and that ’s why th? th??ri?? n??d?d to be evolved furth?r.A? a matter of f??t, though th? bur??u?r?ti? theory of Max W?b?r i? ?ft?n ?riti?i??d as a slow ???r???h t? m?n?g?m?nt and increased ?r?du?tivit?, it is ?till one ?f th? only ???r???h?? th?t makes it ????ibl? to m?n?g? l?rg? gr?u?? and organizations ?u?????full?.Think about it like thi?, h?w w?uld the milit?r? fun?ti?n without bureaucratic?H?w w?uld g?v?rnm?nt really fun?ti?n with strict rul?? ?nd regulations?What i? your ??ini?n?