Cat Bill

Governor Stevenson opposes the passing of the khat Bill that results cats to be taken away from streets to protect birds. By being straight anterior the governor uses language to persuade the senate that this gamin is unnecessary. The governor uses expatiate words to prove his point. Stevenson organizes his argument by listing the outcomes if the stop over passes such as, how it would affect the people and the cats. For example, this schnoz will set aside people to call the police to jug the cats in retick unfairly. The governor clearly points that it is irrational to place cats behind destroy since it is their nature to roam around the streets. By using remand the governor makes the bill sound foolish due to the occurrence that only those who commit a crime are come out in jail, not cats. The governor argues that it is their nature to roam around, and that the bill will make a game hunt to a behavior that is as old as time.

By arguing that it is nature the governor persuades the senate that this bill will go against natural life which is unreasonable. Stevenson calls it a game hunt to present how irrational the excuse to go after cats is. His word druthers of as old as time gives a robust picture to the senate to show how one cannot control a cats behavior. through diction the governor criticizes the bill. The governor depicts the throw Bill as irrational through his use of language. By mocking the Cat Bill the governor compares both the cats natural actions to those of a criminal.If you subscribe to get a full essay, order it on our website: Order! CustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper