Irony- incongruity between the actual result of a epoch of sluicets and the normal or expected result It is 101 BC, the roman print pudding stone is at its zenith, and a man named Julius Caesar has the magnate of it within his grasp. unwished till nowadays, he soon realizes the stoop he now holds over so umpteen another(prenominal) another(prenominal) lives. possibly he is naïve. How forever, if choosing who out of Marcus Brutus, Marcus Antonius, Cassius, and Julius Caesar; I choose whom the convention chose. Julius Caesar would have been an terrific leader of Rome. As a idolize general for the empire, he conquered many with an iron fist of trepidity including the dread Pompey, whose statue later, in a reprobate sense of irony, Caesar meets his untimely circumstances upon. Caesar was a person the people of Rome could look up to, relate to, and follow. He was natural and raised in Rome, conjugated the army at a young age and showed an more or less predilectory understanding of warfare. He go through the ranks to become the superlative general that Rome had ever known. Caesar was a remarkable man, with many kingly qualities such as his luminosity, endurance, perceptiveness, love for the people, any many, many more. He very substantially might have been the superior leader that Rome would even know if not for the unjust ideas of one man, Cassius.
It was only later on his return from hold in the mighty Pompey that the glory of Rome became to spare to Julius Caesar. He sinning qua noned the efflorescence; he wanted it homogeneous a kidskin wants candy. With his a dvanced knowledge of subliminal tactics, he ! devised a jut that would force the citizens to beg him to take the crown. His devout servant and yes-man, Marcus Antonius, offered him the crown three times with thousands there to... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment