Understanding the Writing Process

Part A - synthesis and Analysis \nKimberly Nelson, author of the chapter, The massive Conversation (of the Dining Hall): ane Students Experience of College-Level create verbally,  from the book What is College-Level Writing?, describes the transition from high-school physical composition to college-level report with her personal experiences. Although Nelson expresses the importance of, meditative thinking  in the opus process, she strongly conveys that feedback and constructive blame are essential to sure-fire writing, which is her connection to the idea that writing is a social process. Nelsons need for validation  from her professor was the impulsive force behind eyesight writing as a social process. She started off bitty with consulting with her stick, whom happened to be a teacher, near her issues she was having about the paper. Her mother offered to check the paper, and in turn her mother generated ideas and strategies for Lindemann to improve her writing. Her mother boosted her self-assertion to push the envelope, and encouraged her, saying, You fork out got to take the risks if you want the reward.  Thereafter, Nelson began to enforce the opinions of others and eventually created a writers workshop at her college. She soon became to hit that her peers ideas and comments made her writing improve. \nIn the chapter, What Does the Process Involve?  from the book, A Rhetoric for Writing Teachers, Erika Lindemann states that it is possible to have someone check your writing and, However censorious anothers responses may be, it nevertheless suggests sources of confusion, vestigial ideas, vague language, and alternatives for improving the routine.  Lindemann uses the workshop method after she leaves the piece of writing alone for a few days, then she utilizes the proofreaders comments to, ferret out her real message. Lindemann explains four diverse perspectives on invention as seen through the eyes of Karen burke Lefebvr e. Le...