Government and Politics - The Atheist Civil-Liberty Union :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

The atheistical Civil-Liberty Union The American Civil Liberties Union has a human beings docket, and that agenda appears to be this to make the United States in all her public manifestations bound an atheists view of the populations founding and continuing existence. Is it item 84 on the ACLUs create agenda that calls for the elimination of In beau ideal We Trust from our coins? Under God must also be torn from the Pledge of Allegiance. The Commandments given Moses must never appear as public symbols. This nation must so thoroughly appear to be atheist in public as to be, in fact, and for all practical purposes, atheist in all public spheres. The sweet air of liberty must be re carryd with an invisible gunman that detects, exterminates, and suffocates any breath that would expel a religious word in public life. Publicly, religion must be totally repressed, so that in short only atheists go away find the public atmosphere comfortable. The accommodation this nation long ago reached between believers and nonbelievers must be aband aced. Religion shall be banned from all public appearances under government auspices, until it is totally squeezed squander into private life, underground. There, harmless, it can survive as long as it may. Ideally, whatever atheists have written and many have heavily implied, religion will perish forever. Its vanishing will free the planet from divisiveness, intolerance, hatred, persecution, and the desire to sweep secondary views from public existence. Secularism, the domain of a functions best hope for tolerance, will then rule triumphant, sweetly, having impelled its foes from every inch of public existence. To save the world from intolerance, the ACLU must be rigorously intolerant. Atheism is a long-term project. It is not completed when one ceases believing in God. It is necessary to carry it through until one empties from the world all the conceptual space once filled by God. superstar must also, for inst ance, abandon the conviction that the events, phenomena, and laws of the world we live in (those of the on the whole universe) cohere, belong together, have a unity. What is born from chance may be ruled by chance, quite insanely. Most atheists one meets, however, take up a position rather less rigorous. To the big question - Did the world of our experience, with all its seeming intelligibility and laws, come into existence by chance, or by the action of an agent that placed that intelligibility there in the first place?